Students of behavioral finance must have had a field day this past week. In the wake of a month of dismal economic reports, Wall Street got its risk on with a few better than expected reports on manufacturing sentiment, home sales, and employment. Hopium, it appears, is a powerful drug.

Faith in the underlying mechanics of portfolio theory and market efficiency has certainly contributed to humanity’s recent leap forward in wealth, productivity, private innovation, and global integration. But that same numerology has since crippled our aging financial system and triggered the worst global recession in nearly a century. Perhaps it’s time to reassess the value – and the logic – of bleeding edge finance.
As Professor Janeway points out in the following interview, treating securities like molecules, subject to the same variable distributions, “random walks”, differential equations, and reductionist math simply compounds the short-sighted actions of a few scientists-turned-gamblers. Not only does it greatly overstate the predictive power of econometric analysis, but it also understates the tremendous dangers of financial engineering. …

Even market cheerleaders are struggling to find good news to rally around these days. With labor, capital, finance, real estate, and consumer markets all reeling from a half-decade of credit-fueled gluttony, and commodities markets cresting near all-time highs, it might seem a bit clichéd to highlight yet another bearish commentator — unless that bear is David Rosenberg, one of the few bulge-bracket economists to voice frequent and convincing skepticism about the “resilience” of modern capital markets and highlight the irrational optimism of the average investor.

In this recent Times OpEd, Rochester economics professor Steve Landsburg points out how easily John Q. Public overlooks cause and effect in 21st century markets.
Let’s review: 1) goods and services require labor and capital to produce; 2) the price of labor and capital impact an item’s ultimate price; 3) factors of production are much less expensive in the developing world; 4) a decades-long public war on inflation in the developed world has prevented the price of goods from increasing in step with wages; however, 5) wage growth is now slowing and inflation has reached a 17-year high; thus 6) in their quest to find the lowest price, consumers who rebel against off-shoring jobs are simply biting the hand that …

November 23, 2006—More dour news about the coming financial apocalypse, this time by noted economic strategist Dr. Gary Shilling. The augur, once again, is a hyper-inflated housing market, driven principally by excessive leverage, scandalous consumer spending, and inexhaustible financial optimism. “And why not?” you might ask. Everyone and their uncle has made money in real estate over the past five years, from the slummiest crack house to the most decadent penthouse. The more money everyone has, the more money everyone spends, and most developed economies have profited handsomely from that arrangement.
To get a sense of why the experts are now tempering such myopic enthusiasm, and why these so-called “speculative episodes” are inherently not in the economy’s best interests, read some …

How can you compare the human body to an athletic shoe? Or worse still, the internal combustion engine? Those libertarians over at the Cato Institute have been sniffing some serious salt. With cardiac surgery approaching $100,000 a pop in the hands of the private sector, I’d be willing to bet that a 25-week wait in publicly-funded Sweden sounds pretty damn good to a Mexican waiter in Queens, or a Persian schoolteacher in East L.A. Which raises the obvious question: who’s health in really under the public’s beneficent care? Is it the endlessly wealthy or the helplessly weak? The answer, it turns out, is neither — unless you’re a surgeon or a pharma rep…